民联正式宣布，执政全面实施回教刑法...

民联正式宣布，执政全面实施回教刑法.. 这是12月21日的宣布，这里开始又有人要诬赖媒体听错了？不然，就说国阵的肮脏手段了，只要是民联PAS回教党高层领导在媒体前正式宣布的，都归纳国阵的误导？

从以前到现在PAS还是坚持理念，而这里就有很多人自圆其说的，还要骗人民与PAS会叫党合作的典当非回教徒的自由。

你如何辩护都罢，事实归于事实...

马华：首相更应告诫巫统党员勿发表极端言论

14/12/2008

(吉隆坡14日讯) 马华中央党部发言人李伟杰呼吁首相更必须告诫巫统党员，在发表任何言论时，必须顾及各种族的感受和看法，因为部分巫统党员屡次的极端言论，已经严重伤害各族人民，尤其是华印族的感受。

马华认同首相拿督斯里阿都拉在人联党代表大会的言论，即国阵成员党在争取或协商的时候，应该考量其他友党的感受，避免在争取过程中引发敏感和不安的情绪。

但是马华强调，除了顾虑国阵友党的感受，更重要的是国阵成员党在议政或发表言论的时候，必须顾及人民的感受，以免破坏国民之间的和谐。

马华要提醒首相的是，多年来令国人不满的言论主要由巫统党员所提出，包括“2006年巫统代表大会极端言论”、“月漏论”、“华人寄居论”、“出水论”、“各源流学校统一以国语教学”等，都具有挑衅其他种族及性别歧视的味道，严重地伤害了人民的感受，也对国阵成员党之间的合作造成破坏。

马华坚持，虽然部分国内政党，包括马华与巫统是由单一族群组成，但他们必须具备现代化政党的格局与风范，以开阔的党政视野看待全民议题，千万不要坠入种族主义的死胡同。

也是马华新闻局主任的李伟杰重申，马华党章开宗明义地阐明，马华虽由单一种族组成，但除了确保马来西亚华裔合法权利之外，也必须确保其他民族的合法权利和利益，均获得承认和保护。

马华与各国阵成员党，将全力维护全民在联邦宪法之下的权益。马来西亚国民绝对不能戴着零和游戏的眼镜来看待种族之间的差异；相反的，我们应该秉持“共荣辱”的精神，不分种族地协助全民，提高普罗大众的生活素质，抒解民困。

民联的回教党青年团，反对槟州办街舞比赛…

回教党青年团反对槟州举办I-Dance街舞比赛

（槟城5日马新社讯）槟州回教党青年团今日反对I-Dance街舞比赛，并指这对社会没带来益处。

槟州回青团长莫哈末哈菲兹指这个由州青年及体育委员会赞助，在新世界举办的I-Dance比赛不仅以曳步舞的舞蹈方式提升街头文化，更会增加年轻一代的社会问题。

他在一项声明中指出，他要槟州政府与槟州首长林冠英配合的“Amar Ma'ruf Nahi Mungka”（预防罪恶/罪行享受美好成果）行政口号，取消这项活动。

据了解，这项由Danzity 制作主办的比赛的目的是为了向青少年宣传利用空闲时间来进行健康活动。

初赛将会在12月20日于新世界进行，而决赛将在12月27日于皇后湾广场进行。

========================================================================================

新闻来自光华日报：http://mandarin.bernama.com/v2/newslist_detail.php?id=37564


朋友们，请问街舞很性感吗？
朋友们，内政部有没有数据显示街舞舞蹈员是社会问题的根源？

回教党青年团反对举办街舞比赛，
他们更要求槟州政府取消这次活动，这是一个什么道理？!

街舞也被这些人政治化？我理解任何课题都可能被扭曲，也可能成为政治人物的免费宣传，万万想不到，就连一个普通的舞蹈活动也被回教党青年团借题发挥！

马来西亚什么都可以？我倒佩服。。。。

如果回青团认为社会问题都是因为街舞造成的，这岂不是一个很可笑的逻辑吗？因为这是一个没有论据的指证，同时也误导群众的言论，作为一名政治领袖不应该作出不负责任的言论。

我希望槟州政府不要受到不必要的言论影响而取消活动，不然会让青年组织失望。同时也希望槟州政府，不要因为政治考量或是政治盟友的施压而取消活动，因为这样做会让很多青年失望，就连一个舞蹈活动也被政治化。

我建议回青团应该和槟州政府见面，了解后，才作出反对的声明，不然无理由的反对是让人觉得不可理喻。同时也质疑回青团经常借题发挥，经常玩弄一些课题，并发出一些不负责任的言论，包括指街舞是社会问题的根源。

过去很多青年组织也主办过类似的活动，同时也起了很大的回响，包括吸纳了很多非华裔的青年参与，这是一个团结全民的活动，是有目共睹的。我不了解为何回青团无法接受！！

回青团真的是厉害，借题发挥，什么都可讲。。。

我发现行动党与回教党的距离，越来越远。。。。

一个街舞比赛，竟然要搞到上报纸，而不是先和盟友了解讨论。。。

我们不希望民联胡搞。在槟州，行动党作为主导执政党，但是回青团却仿佛反对党似，虽然，什么东西都应该透明化，但毕竟是盟友，为何不能事先讨论呢？

不然这些盟党成立一个联盟干什么？

MCA Legal Bureau to Mukhriz Mahathir: Respect the Federal Constitution. Don’t mess up Malaysia’s education system

3/12/2008

Media Statement

Issued by MCA Legal Bureau in response to Jerlun MP YB Dato’ Mukhriz Mahathir’s call for the abolition of vernacular school system

MCA Legal Bureau to Mukriz Mahathir: Respect the Federal Constitution. Don’t mess up Malaysia’s education system

The Federal Constitution is yet again under siege and this time Article 152 is tested notwithstanding that it is trite that the questioning of Part III or Articles 152, 153 and 181 of the Federal Constitution is deemed seditious and made absolute by section 3 Sedition Act 1948 [revised 1969].

Mukhriz’s call for the abolition of the vernacular school system by integrating it into the national school system fly in the face of Article 152[1][a] which inter-alia states that ‘no person shall be prohibited or prevented from using [otherwise than for official purposes] or from teaching or learning any other language and [b] nothing in this Clause shall prejudice the right of the Federal Government or of any State Government to preserve and sustain the use and study of the language of any other community in the Federation’.

Such call is seditious as defined in Section 3 [1][f] Sedition Act 1948[revised 1969] where a ‘seditious tendency’ is inter-alia questioning any matter, right, status, provision privilege, sovereignty or prerogative established or protected by the provisions of Pts III of the Federal Constitution or Articles 152, 153 or 181 of the Federal Constitution. MCA condemns such irresponsible statement and calls for an immediate end to such political posturing.

MCA invites all Malaysians to visit the case of Melan Bin Abdullah & Anor vs PP [1971] 1 LNS 77 where on appeal, the High Court held that the prosecution has proven its case to the hilt. In this case, the Utusan Melayu on 6^th April 1971 an editorial subheading : ‘Hapuskan Sekolah Beraliran Tamil atau China’. The Court held that the subheading was a clear violation of what was laid down in Article 152 and therefore comes squarely within the definition of ‘serious tendency’ as extended by para [f] Section 3 Sedition Act 1948.

Mukhriz in making the statement in Parliament lobby went on to justify that he did not have any other intention when coming up with the suggestion except to unite the people is no excuse. The Learned Judge in Melan Bin Abdullah said’…..In my view para [f] is unique in that it raises a presumption of law that anything falling squarely within the terms thereof has a serious tendency, irrespective of whether or not such things sows any seeds of disaffection……’

Further in PP v Mark Koding [1982] 1 LNS 96, the accused, an MP was charged with uttering seditious words in the course of his speech in Malay in Dewan Rakyat on 11^th October 1978 where he, inter-alia called for the closure of Chinese and Tamil schools by questioning the policy of the Government in allowing Chinese and Tamil Schools to continue in this country. He questioned the use of Chinese and Tamil on road signboards. He went one step further by suggesting that if such closure and restriction contravene Article 152, then the Federal Constitution should be amended in the interest of the people and the nation. Mohamed Azmi J [as he then was] found the accused guilty.

In PP v Marking Koding an MP in his speech in Parliament uttering seditious words was charged and found guilty by the Court for inter-alia advocating the closure of Chinese and Tamil schools. Now, MP for Jerlun has also made suggestion to abolish Chinese /vernacular schools in the lobby of Parliament. In light of the above authorities, are the statements made not seditious?

MCA Legal Bureau demands MP for Jerlun to make a public apology to all Malaysians and refrains from such political rhetoric. The law is clear and no one is above the law. The supremacy of the Federal Constitution must be defended at all times and respected by all Malaysians.

Datuk Leong Tang Chong

Chairman

MCA Legal Bureau